↓ Skip to main content

Colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
19 patents
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
1107 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Colorectal cancer
Published in
The Lancet, March 2010
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60353-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Substantial progress has been made in colorectal cancer in the past decade. Screening, used to identify individuals at an early stage, has improved outcome. There is greater understanding of the genetic basis of inherited colorectal cancer and identification of patients at risk. Optimisation of surgery for patients with localised disease has had a major effect on survival at 5 years and 10 years. For rectal cancer, identification of patients at greatest risk of local failure is important in the selection of patients for preoperative chemoradiation, a strategy proven to improve outcomes in these patients. Stringent postoperative follow-up helps the early identification of potentially radically treatable oligometastatic disease and improves long-term survival. Treatment with adjuvant fluoropyrimidine for colon and rectal cancers further improves survival, more so in stage III than in stage II disease, and oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy is now routinely used for stage III disease, although efficacy must be carefully balanced against toxicity. In stage II disease, molecular markers such as microsatellite instability might help select patients for treatment. The integration of targeted treatments with conventional cytotoxic drugs has expanded the treatment of metastatic disease resulting in incremental survival gains. However, biomarker development is essential to aid selection of patients likely to respond to therapy, thereby rationalising treatments and improving outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 14 1%
Unknown 1062 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 192 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 167 15%
Student > Master 157 14%
Researcher 129 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 75 7%
Other 212 19%
Unknown 175 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 402 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 199 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 147 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 3%
Chemistry 29 3%
Other 91 8%
Unknown 209 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2026.
All research outputs
#1,988,255
of 31,211,351 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#12,845
of 49,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,774
of 125,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#50
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,211,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.