↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of distal residue participation in enzyme catalysis

Overview of attention for article published in Protein Science, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
67 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prediction of distal residue participation in enzyme catalysis
Published in
Protein Science, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/pro.2648
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A scoring method for the prediction of catalytically important residues in enzyme structures is presented and used to examine the participation of distal residues in enzyme catalysis. Scores are based on the Partial Order Optimum Likelihood (POOL) machine learning method, using computed electrostatic properties, surface geometric features, and information obtained from the phylogenetic tree as input features. Predictions of distal residue participation in catalysis are compared with experimental kinetics data from the literature on variants of the featured enzymes; some additional kinetics measurements are reported for variants of Pseudomonas putida nitrile hydratase (ppNH) and for E. coli alkaline phosphatase (AP). The multi-layer active sites of Pseudomonas putida nitrile hydratase and of human phosphoglucose isomerase are predicted by the POOL logZP scores, as is the single-layer active site of Pseudomonas putida ketosteroid isomerase. The logZP score cutoff utilized here results in over-prediction of distal residue involvement in E. coli alkaline phosphatase. While fewer experimental data points are available for Pseudomonas putida mandelate racemase and for human carbonic anhydrase II, the POOL logZP scores properly predict the previously reported participation of distal residues. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 22%
Chemistry 11 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2026.
All research outputs
#4,384,346
of 30,598,342 outputs
Outputs from Protein Science
#366
of 4,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,738
of 289,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein Science
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,598,342 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,263 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.