↓ Skip to main content

REPRODUCTIVE CASTE DETERMINATION IN EUSOCIAL WASPS (HYMENOPTERA: VESPIDAE)

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Entomology, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
REPRODUCTIVE CASTE DETERMINATION IN EUSOCIAL WASPS (HYMENOPTERA: VESPIDAE)
Published in
Annual Review of Entomology, January 1998
DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean O'Donnell

Abstract

Wasps (Vespidae) exhibit a range of social complexity, from solitary living to eusocial colonies, and thus are exemplary for studies of the evolutionary origin and maintenance of social behavior in animals. Integral to the definition of eusociality is the presence of reproductive castes, group members that differ qualitatively in their ability to reproduce in a social setting. Behavioral and morphological evidence suggests that caste determination, the developmental process by which differences in fecundity are established, occurs to a large extent before adult emergence (pre-imaginally) in many species of Vespidae, in both basal and advanced taxa within the clade (Vespinae+Polistinae), which includes most eusocial species. Pre-imaginal determination has been documented in many taxa (e.g. independent-founding Polistinae) where it was not thought to occur. Correlative and experimental studies indicate that differences in nutrition during larval development are often the basis of pre-imaginal caste determination. Pre-imaginal caste determination has important implications for the roles of subfertility and manipulation by nest mates in the evolution of eusocial behavior.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Brazil 4 2%
New Zealand 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 176 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 29%
Researcher 40 21%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 35 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#12,343,970
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Entomology
#727
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,271
of 132,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Entomology
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.