You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Resting-State Functional MRI: Everything That Nonexperts Have Always Wanted to Know
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a5527 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. Lv, Z. Wang, E. Tong, L.M. Williams, G. Zaharchuk, M. Zeineh, A.N. Goldstein-Piekarski, T.M. Ball, C. Liao, M. Wintermark |
| Abstract |
Resting-state fMRI was first described by Biswal et al in 1995 and has since then been widely used in both healthy subjects and patients with various neurologic, neurosurgical, and psychiatric disorders. As opposed to paradigm- or task-based functional MR imaging, resting-state fMRI does not require subjects to perform any specific task. The low-frequency oscillations of the resting-state fMRI signal have been shown to relate to the spontaneous neural activity. There are many ways to analyze resting-state fMRI data. In this review article, we will briefly describe a few of these and highlight the advantages and limitations of each. This description is to facilitate the adoption and use of resting-state fMRI in the clinical setting, helping neuroradiologists become familiar with these techniques and applying them for the care of patients with neurologic and psychiatric diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| Denmark | 2 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 976 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 976 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 166 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 131 | 13% |
| Researcher | 114 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 98 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 63 | 6% |
| Other | 137 | 14% |
| Unknown | 267 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 214 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 13% |
| Psychology | 95 | 10% |
| Engineering | 57 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 3% |
| Other | 108 | 11% |
| Unknown | 345 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#338,501
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#20
of 5,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,804
of 452,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.