↓ Skip to main content

Obstetric fistulas: A clinical review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Obstetric fistulas: A clinical review
Published in
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, September 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.06.021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A high proportion of genitourinary fistulas have an obstetric origin. Obstetric fistulas are caused by prolonged obstructed labor coupled with a lack of medical attention. While successful management with prolonged bladder drainage has occasionally been reported, mature fistulas require formal operative repair, and it is crucial that the first repair is done properly. The literature reports 3 approaches to fistula repair: vaginal, abdominal, and combined vaginal and abdominal. Many authors report high success rates for the surgical closure of obstetric fistulas at the time of hospital discharge, without further evaluation of the repair's effect on urinary continence or subsequent quality of life. Data on obstetric fistulas are scarce, and thus many questions regarding fistula management remain unanswered. A standardized terminology and classification, as well as a data reporting system on the surgical management of obstetric fistulas and its outcomes, are critical steps that need to be taken immediately.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 26 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2026.
All research outputs
#8,164,880
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#1,484
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,152
of 72,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.