↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Ascospore Release of Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi of Blueberry with Machine Learning.

Overview of attention for article published in Phytopathology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predicting Ascospore Release of Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi of Blueberry with Machine Learning.
Published in
Phytopathology, September 2017
DOI 10.1094/phyto-04-17-0162-r
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mummy berry, caused by Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi, causes economic losses of highbush blueberry in the US Pacific Northwest (PNW). Apothecia develop from mummified berries overwintering on soil surfaces and produce ascospores that infect tissue emerging from floral and vegetative buds. Disease control currently relies on fungicides applied on a calendar-basis rather than inoculum availability. To establish a prediction model for ascospore release, apothecial development was tracked in three fields, one in western OR and two in northwestern WA in 2015 and 2016. Air and soil temperature, precipitation, soil moisture, leaf wetness, relative humidity and solar radiation were monitored using in-field weather stations and WSU's AgWeatherNet stations. Four modeling approaches were compared: logistic regression, multivariate adaptive regression splines, artificial neural networks and random forest. A supervised learning approach was used to train the models on two data sets: training (70%) and testing (30%). The importance of environmental factors was calculated for each model separately. Soil temperature, soil moisture, and solar radiation were identified as the most important factors influencing ascospore release. Random forest models, with 78% accuracy, showed the best performance compared to the other models. Results of this research helps PNW blueberry growers to optimize fungicide use and reduce production costs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 17 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Computer Science 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,573,525
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Phytopathology
#741
of 3,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,624
of 323,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytopathology
#18
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.