↓ Skip to main content

Tumor immunity and survival as a function of alternative neopeptides in human cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
patent
8 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tumor immunity and survival as a function of alternative neopeptides in human cancer
Published in
Cancer Immunology Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-17-0559
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The immune system exerts antitumor activity via T cell-dependent recognition of tumor-specific antigens. Although the number of tumor neopeptides - peptides derived from somatic mutations - often correlates with immune activity and survival, most classically defined high-affinity neopeptides (CDNs) are not immunogenic, and only rare CDNs have been linked to tumor rejection. Thus, the rules of tumor antigen recognition remain incompletely understood. Here, we analyzed neopeptides, immune activity, and clinical outcome from 6,324 patients across 27 tumor types. We characterized a class of 'alternatively defined neopeptides' (ADNs), which are mutant peptides predicted to bind MHC (class I or II) with improved affinity relative to their non-mutated counterpart. ADNs are abundant and molecularly distinct from CDNs. The load of ADNs correlated with intratumoral T-cell responses and immune suppression, and ADNs were also strong predictors of patient survival across tumor types. These results expand the spectrum of mutation-derived tumor antigens with potential clinical relevance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 23 23%
Other 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Computer Science 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,683,977
of 34,397,553 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology Research
#323
of 1,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,711
of 372,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology Research
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,397,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.