↓ Skip to main content

Elemental analysis of proteins by microPIXE

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Elemental analysis of proteins by microPIXE
Published in
Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, October 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The identification and quantification of metals bound to proteins is a crucial problem to be solved in structural biology. This paper describes the technique of particle induced X-ray emission with a microfocused beam (microPIXE) as a tool for analysing the elemental composition of liquid and crystalline protein samples. The proton beam induces characteristic X-ray emission from all elements in the protein, which can be interpreted in terms of the metal content of the protein molecule with a relative accuracy of between 10% and 20%. The compelling advantage of this method is that the sulphur atoms in the methionines and cysteines of the protein provide an internal calibration of the number of protein molecules present so that systematic errors are minimised and the technique is entirely internally self-consistent. This is achieved by the simultaneous measurement of the energy of backscattered protons (Rutherford backscattering), to enable us to determine the matrix composition and thickness, and so correct the PIXE data for the self-absorption of X-rays in the sample. The theoretical background to the technique is described, and the technical and experimental procedures are outlined. Examples of recent measurements are given which have informed a range of investigations in structural biology. The use of the technique is increasing and we envisage that future developments will enable it to become a routine high-throughput method.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 32%
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 34%
Chemistry 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Physics and Astronomy 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#12,343,970
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology
#469
of 1,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,061
of 100,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.