↓ Skip to main content

Differences between IQ and school achievement in anorexia nervosa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differences between IQ and school achievement in anorexia nervosa
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology, February 2006
DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(198905)45:3<433::aid-jclp2270450313>3.0.co;2-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Anorexia nervosa is a multidimensional syndrome in which perfectionistic striving appears as a common component of the symptom cluster. Multiple studies have linked this character trait to attempts to achieve a "perfect" weight. In contrast, no empirical data are available that document perfectionistic striving outside of food and weight themes. The present study (N = 20) looked for evidence of perfectionistic striving in school behavior by comparing school achievement and IQ scores. School achievement was found to be significantly greater than would be predicted by IQ scores. This finding and directions for future research are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2026.
All research outputs
#8,727,154
of 27,265,018 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology
#249
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,404
of 99,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology
#40
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,265,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.