↓ Skip to main content

Some comments on models for field enhancement

Overview of attention for article published in Ultramicroscopy, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Some comments on models for field enhancement
Published in
Ultramicroscopy, May 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0304-3991(02)00297-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Romania 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 92 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 38%
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 39 38%
Engineering 28 27%
Materials Science 11 11%
Chemistry 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,790,981
of 27,773,453 outputs
Outputs from Ultramicroscopy
#80
of 1,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,258
of 61,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultramicroscopy
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,773,453 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.