↓ Skip to main content

Sildenafil for Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction in Men With Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
28 patents
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sildenafil for Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction in Men With Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 1999
DOI 10.1001/jama.281.5.421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc S. Rendell, Jacob Rajfer, Pierre A. Wicker, Michael D. Smith, for the Sildenafil Diabetes Study Group

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 20 28%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,629,614
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#11,941
of 42,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,655
of 144,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#30
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.