↓ Skip to main content

Donor-specific B-cell tolerance after ABO-incompatible infant heart transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Donor-specific B-cell tolerance after ABO-incompatible infant heart transplantation
Published in
Nature Medicine, October 2004
DOI 10.1038/nm1126
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although over 50 years have passed since its first laboratory description, intentional induction of immune tolerance to foreign antigens has remained an elusive clinical goal. We previously reported that the requirement for ABO compatibility in heart transplantation is not applicable to infants. Here, we show that ABO-incompatible heart transplantation during infancy results in development of B-cell tolerance to donor blood group A and B antigens. This mimics animal models of neonatal tolerance and indicates that the human infant is susceptible to intentional tolerance induction. Tolerance in this setting occurs by elimination of donor-reactive B lymphocytes and may be dependent upon persistence of some degree of antigen expression. These findings suggest that intentional exposure to nonself A and B antigens may prolong the window of opportunity for ABO-incompatible transplantation, and have profound implications for clinical research on tolerance induction to T-independent antigens relevant to xenotransplantation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Sweden 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 42 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2025.
All research outputs
#3,329,863
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#4,439
of 8,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,798
of 62,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#12
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 98.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.