↓ Skip to main content

High‐Risk Human Papillomavirus Types and Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Respiratory Papillomas

Overview of attention for article published in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High‐Risk Human Papillomavirus Types and Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Respiratory Papillomas
Published in
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, May 2016
DOI 10.1053/hn.1999.v120.a91773
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Respiratory papillomas (RPs) are benign, virally induced tumors of the larynx and respiratory epithelium that may obstruct the airway and tend to recur frequently. RPs are thought to be the result of infection with the human papillomaviruses (HPVs) types 6 and 11. We surveyed archival RP specimens to determine whether there were correlations of HPV type with patient characteristics or clinical course. Paraffin-embedded papilloma specimens of 45 different patients were analyzed. We assessed HPV types using the polymerase chain reaction with E6 consensus primers, hybrid capture assays (high or low risk), and dot blot hybridization of generic E6 PCR products with E6 type-specific oligonucleotide probes. The presence and type of HPV were correlated with patient data from a retrospective chart review. We found that RPs may have either low- or high-risk HPV types and some contain multiple HPV types. Respiratory infection with high-risk HPV apparently introduces a long-term risk of squamous cell carcinoma development, even in the absence of conventional cofactors. Low-risk HPV infection may also act in association with these cofactors to promote carcinogenesis. Our data also show a racial imbalance in RP that may indicate a difference in genetic resistance and/or susceptibility to HPV infection and the development of RP.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Professor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Philosophy 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2018.
All research outputs
#9,467,948
of 27,627,301 outputs
Outputs from Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
#1,471
of 4,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,108
of 317,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
#177
of 556 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,627,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 556 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.