↓ Skip to main content

Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Relates to Cardiovascular Events in Adults Aged <45 Years

Overview of attention for article published in Hypertension, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Relates to Cardiovascular Events in Adults Aged <45 Years
Published in
Hypertension, January 2015
DOI 10.1161/hypertensionaha.114.04658
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anouk L M Eikendal, Karlijn A Groenewegen, Todd J Anderson, Annie R Britton, Gunnar Engström, Greg W Evans, Jacqueline de Graaf, Diederick E Grobbee, Bo Hedblad, Suzanne Holewijn, Ai Ikeda, Kazuo Kitagawa, Akihiko Kitamura, Eva M Lonn, Matthias W Lorenz, Ellisiv B Mathiesen, Giel Nijpels, Jacqueline M Dekker, Shuhei Okazaki, Daniel H O'Leary, Joseph F Polak, Jacqueline F Price, Christine Robertson, Christopher M Rembold, Maria Rosvall, Tatjana Rundek, Jukka T Salonen, Matthias Sitzer, Coen D A Stehouwer, Imo E Hoefer, Sanne A E Peters, Michiel L Bots, Hester M den Ruijter

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 32 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Hypertension
#3,455
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,864
of 366,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hypertension
#26
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.