↓ Skip to main content

Association of β-Amyloid and Apolipoprotein E ε4 With Memory Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Neurology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
25 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Association of β-Amyloid and Apolipoprotein E ε4 With Memory Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
Published in
JAMA Neurology, April 2018
DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4325
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Older age, high levels of β-amyloid (Aβ), and the presence of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele are risk factors for Alzheimer disease (AD). However, the extent to which increasing age, Aβ, and ε4 are associated with memory decline remains unclear, and the age at which memory decline begins for Aβ-positive ε4 carriers and noncarriers has not been determined. To determine the association of age, Aβ level, and APOE ε4 with memory decline in a large group of cognitively healthy older adults. This longitudinal observational study included cognitively healthy older adults (age >60 years) enrolled in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study from March 31, 2006, through March 31, 2017; of 1583 individuals enrolled, 1136 refused or were excluded owing to other criteria (eg, having mild cognitive impairment or AD). Participants underwent Aβ imaging in research clinics in Perth and Melbourne and more than 72 months of follow-up (at 18-month intervals). The association of age with memory was fitted to a quadratic model. Age was treated as a continuous, time-dependent variable. β-Amyloid imaging using positron emission tomography, genotyping for APOE ɛ4, and longitudinal neuropsychological assessments of episodic memory during the 72-month follow-up. Episodic memory composite score. Of the 447 participants, 203 (45.4%) were men and 244 (54.6%) were women; mean (SD) age was 72.5 (6.6) years. Equal proportions of female participants were observed in each Aβ-ɛ4 group (24 of 51 Aβ-positive ε4 noncarriers [47.1%] ; 35 of 64 Aβ-negative ε4 carriers [54.7%]; 40 of 72 Aβ-positive ε4 carriers [55.6%]; and 145 of 260 Aβ-negative ε4 noncarriers [55.8%]). Adults with Aβ findings (mean [SD] age, 74.4 [6.8] years) were approximately 4 years older than those negative for Aβ (mean [SD] age, 69.8 [6.1] years). Memory decline diverged significantly from Aβ-negative ɛ4 noncarriers at an earlier age in Aβ-positive ɛ4 carriers (64.5 years) than in Aβ-positive ɛ4 noncarriers (76.5 years), such that by 85 years of age, Aβ-positive ε4 carriers performed approximately 1.5 SD units worse on the episodic memory composite than Aβ-negative ε4 noncarriers and approximately 0.8 SD units worse than Aβ-positive ε4 noncarriers. Memory performance of Aβ-negative ɛ4 carriers did not differ from that of the Aβ-negative ɛ4 noncarriers (estimate [SE], 0.001 [0.001]; t = 0.526; P = .77). Prior work has shown that Aβ and ε4 combine to influence memory decline in nondemented older adults. Results of this study indicate that increasing age may further exacerbate these effects. The estimates provided may be used to determine the risk of memory decline associated with Aβ and ε4 at each age.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Master 12 7%
Other 9 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 61 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 16%
Psychology 24 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 74 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,820,263
of 34,323,687 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#1,712
of 3,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,137
of 372,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#36
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,323,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.