↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge of Evidence-Based Cancer Risk Factors Remains Low Among New Zealand Adults: Findings from Two Cross-Sectional Studies, 2001 and 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Knowledge of Evidence-Based Cancer Risk Factors Remains Low Among New Zealand Adults: Findings from Two Cross-Sectional Studies, 2001 and 2015
Published in
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, November 2017
DOI 10.22034/apjcp.2017.18.11.2931
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Objective: Cancer risk reduction messages are a part of cancer control efforts around the world. The complex reality is that risk factors differ for different types of cancer, making clear communication of desired behavioural changes more difficult. This study aims to describe awareness of risk factors for breast, bowel, cervical, prostate and lung cancer and cutaneous melanoma among New Zealanders in 2014/15 and identify changes in awareness since 2001. Methods: Two national telephone surveys, the first (CAANZ01) conducted in 2001, included 438 adults (231 females and 207 males, 64% response rate). The second, conducted in 2014/15 (CAANZ15), included 1064 adults (588 females and 476 males, 64% response rate). Results: In 2014/5, most participants could identify evidence-based risk factors for lung cancer and melanoma. In contrast, many participants were unable to name any risk factors (evidence-based or otherwise) for bowel (34.8%), breast (48.8%), cervical (53.9%) and prostate cancer (60.9%). Between 2001 and 2014/5 there were increases in the proportion of individuals identifying sunbeds as increasing melanoma risk, and alcohol consumption and family history as increasing risk for bowel and breast cancer. Conclusions: Effective communication of risk information for specific cancers remains a challenge for cancer control. Although some positive changes in awareness over the 14 year period were observed, there remains substantial room for progressing awareness of evidence-based risk factors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Psychology 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,028,540
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
#109
of 3,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,096
of 493,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.