↓ Skip to main content

Review on genetic variants and maternal smoking in the etiology of oral clefts and other birth defects

Overview of attention for article published in Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Review on genetic variants and maternal smoking in the etiology of oral clefts and other birth defects
Published in
Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews, March 2008
DOI 10.1002/bdrc.20117
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A spectrum of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight, and birth defects has been linked with maternal smoking during pregnancy. This article includes a review of studies investigating interactions between genetic variants and maternal smoking in contributing to birth defects using oral clefting as a model birth defect. The primary gene-smoking studies for other major birth defects are also summarized. Gene-environment interaction studies for birth defects are still at an early stage with several mixed results, but evolving research findings have begun to document clinically and developmentally important interactions. As samples and data become increasingly available, more effort is needed in designing innovative analytical methods to study gene-environment interactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 39 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,336,887
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews
#57
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,757
of 133,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.