↓ Skip to main content

Aplastic anemia secondary to propylthiouracil: A rare and life-threatening adverse effect

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Aplastic anemia secondary to propylthiouracil: A rare and life-threatening adverse effect
Published in
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, January 2018
DOI 10.1177/1078155217752079
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Background Propylthiouracil has been in use for more than half a century for the treatment of hyperthyroidism. While it is largely known to cause agranulocytosis, its association with aplastic anemia is rarely heard of. Our case will be the third in literature to suggest aplastic anemia as a manifestation of propylthiouracil, which unfortunately culminated in the death of the patient. Case A 67-year-old female, with recently diagnosed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung, developed hyperthyroidism after being started on Nivolumab and Iplimumab. After she developed atrial fibrillation, she was started on propylthiouracil to control the thyroid activity. Soon after that, she was admitted with severe neutropenia, which progressed to pancytopenia confirmed as aplastic anemia on a bone marrow biopsy. Despite discontinuation of propylthiouracil and aggressive treatment, she developed septic shock and multi-organ failure, leading to her death. Conclusion Aplastic anemia has been sparingly reported as an extremely rare complication of propylthiouracil. Further adding to the ambiguity is the unknown etiology and lack of specific therapy for the complication when attributed to propylthiouracil. The disease can carry an extremely poor prognosis if untreated, as proven by our case. Due to the same reasons, we recommend that further investigations be done to elucidate the pathogenesis and assist with treatment of the disease when caused by propylthiouracil.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Unknown 8 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,584,192
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
#942
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,355
of 441,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
#22
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.