↓ Skip to main content

Acknowledging Rural Disadvantage in Mental Health: Views of Peer Workers

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Acknowledging Rural Disadvantage in Mental Health: Views of Peer Workers
Published in
Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/ppc.12171
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this article was to present views and opinions of people employed to work from their personal experience of significant mental health challenges (peer workers). The specific focus was on their capacity to contribute meaningfully to mental health service provision and in rural areas and associated barriers. Grounded Theory was the methodology utilized. In-depth interviews were conducted with peer workers throughout Australia. Participants described significant barriers to the provision of quality mental health services in rural and regional locations. The two main areas identified were the following: transport and distance, and lack of mental health staff and services. The identified barriers place limitations on the capacity of peer workers to maximize effectiveness in rural settings. Peer workers could potentially play an important role in overcoming shortages of staff and services and improving mental health service delivery.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 32 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 21%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Psychology 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 34 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2024.
All research outputs
#9,387,053
of 27,370,655 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Psychiatric Care
#209
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,393
of 324,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Psychiatric Care
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,370,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.