↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
59 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
D-Dimer Predicts Long-Term Cause-Specific Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, and Cancer in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease
Published in
Circulation, August 2018
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.117.029901
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Background -D-dimer, a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin, is a marker for hypercoagulability and thrombotic events. Moderately elevated levels of D-dimer are associated with the risk of venous and arterial events in patients with vascular disease. We assessed the role of D-dimer levels in predicting long-term vascular outcomes, cause-specific mortality, and new cancers in the LIPID trial in the context of other risk factors. Methods -LIPID randomized patients to placebo or pravastatin 40 mg/day 5-38 months after myocardial infarction or unstable angina. D-dimer levels were measured at baseline and at 1 year. Median follow-up was 6.0 years during the trial and 16 years in total. Results -Baseline D-dimer levels for 7863 patients were grouped by quartile (≤112, 112-173, 173-273, >273 ng/mL). Higher levels were associated with older age, female sex, history of hypertension, poor renal function and elevated levels of B-natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and sensitive troponin I (each P<0.001). During the first 6 years, after adjustment for up to 30 additional risk factors, higher D-dimer was associated with a significantly increased risk of a major coronary event (Q4 vs Q1 HR 1.45; 95% CI 1.21-1.74), major cardiovascular (CVD) event (HR 1.45; 95% CI 1.23-1.71) and venous thromboembolism (HR 4.03 (2.31-7.03; 95% CI 2.31-7.03); each P<0.001. During the 16 years overall, higher D-dimer was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 1.59), CVD mortality (1.61), cancer mortality (1.54) and non-CVD noncancer mortality (1.57) (each P<0.001), remaining significant for deaths from each cause occurring beyond 10 years of follow-up (each P≤0.01). Higher D-dimer also independently predicted an increase in cancer incidence (HR 1.16, P=0.02).The D-dimer level increased the net reclassification index for all-cause mortality by 4.0 and venous thromboembolism by 13.6. Conclusions -D-dimer levels predict long-term risk of arterial and venous events, CVD mortality, and non-CVD noncancer mortality, independently of other risk factors. D-dimer is also a significant predictor of cancer incidence and mortality. These results support an association of D-dimer with fatal events across multiple diseases and demonstrate that this link extends beyond 10 years' follow-up.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 55 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 61 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,549,625
of 34,189,040 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#3,999
of 28,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,466
of 372,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#74
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,189,040 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.