↓ Skip to main content

Potential impacts of poor communication on early diagnosis of HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Nursing, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Potential impacts of poor communication on early diagnosis of HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorder
Published in
Journal of Advanced Nursing, February 2018
DOI 10.1111/jan.13533
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To ascertain whether community-based health care providers were collecting appropriate information to identify patients at risk of HIV associated neurocognitive disorder and whether related documentation was complete. HIV associated neurocognitive disorder is a treatable neurological condition that can affect more than 20% of those infected with the HIV. Signs and symptoms of cognitive impairment may be subtle; therefore, documentation of medical and social information could be beneficial in identifying those at risk DESIGN: Cross sectional descriptive study. An audit of patient records was completed by two community-based interdisciplinary teams with particular attention to the documentation of clinical and social indicators for those at risk of HIV associated neurocognitive disorder. Data were collected over a four-week period during 2015. Data were retrieved from both electronic medical record systems and hard copy patient records. Documentation was incomplete in every patient record (N=262), including the absence of important clinical data relating to nadir CD4+T cell count (91%), HIV viral load (36%), current caregiver (19%) and living circumstances (14%). Up to 40% of recorded medications and results were unconfirmed by the person's medical practitioner. Poor documentation can lead to incomplete information, which can delay early intervention for those at risk of HIV associated neurocognitive disorder. Collection and recording of patient data needs to be consistent, as complete documentation is essential for integrating care, provision of clinical support and importantly, for identifying those at risk of developing HIV associated neurocognitive disorder. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 24 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Psychology 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 32 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,598,490
of 32,289,607 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#2,559
of 7,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,271
of 361,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#40
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,289,607 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.