↓ Skip to main content

Autologous stem cell therapy for inherited and acquired retinal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Regenerative Medicine, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Autologous stem cell therapy for inherited and acquired retinal disease
Published in
Regenerative Medicine, January 2018
DOI 10.2217/rme-2017-0089
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The mammalian retina, derived from neural ectoderm, has little regenerative potential. For conditions where irreversible retinal pigment epithelium or photoreceptor cell loss occurs, advanced techniques are required to restore vision. Inherited retinal dystrophies and some acquired conditions, such as age-related macular degeneration, have a similar end result of photoreceptor cell death leading to debilitating vision loss. These diseases stand to benefit from future regenerative medicine as dietary recommendations and current pharmacologic therapy only seek to prevent further disease progression. Cell-based strategies, such as autologously derived induced pluripotent stem cells, have come a long way in overcoming previous technical and ethical concerns. Clinical trials for such techniques are already underway. These trials and the preceding preclinical studies will be discussed in the context of retinal disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#11,233,973
of 34,039,688 outputs
Outputs from Regenerative Medicine
#419
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,441
of 494,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regenerative Medicine
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,039,688 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.