↓ Skip to main content

Are Allogeneic Blood Transfusions Associated With Decreased Survival After Surgery for Long‐bone Metastatic Fractures?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Are Allogeneic Blood Transfusions Associated With Decreased Survival After Surgery for Long‐bone Metastatic Fractures?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11999-015-4167-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that perioperative blood transfusion increases cancer recurrence and decreases patient survival after resection of primary malignancies. The question arises whether this association also exists in patients with already disseminated disease undergoing surgery for metastatic long-bone fractures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2016.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,879
of 9,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,354
of 410,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#109
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.