↓ Skip to main content

Understanding successful and unsuccessful landings of aerial maneuver variations in professional surfing

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Understanding successful and unsuccessful landings of aerial maneuver variations in professional surfing
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, February 2018
DOI 10.1111/sms.13055
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although performing aerial manoeuvres can increase wave score and winning potential in competitive surfing, the critical features underlying successful aerial performance have not been systematically investigated. This study aimed to analyse highly skilled aerial manoeuvre performance and identify the critical features associated with successful or unsuccessful landing. Using video recordings of the World Surf League's Championship Tour, every aerial performed during the quarterfinal, semi-final and final heats from the 11 events in the 2015 season were viewed. From this 121 aerials were identified with the Frontside Air (n = 15) and Frontside Air Reverse (n = 67) being selected to be qualitatively assessed. Using chi-squared analyses, a series of key critical features, including landing over the centre of the surfboard (FS Air X2 = 14.00, FS Air Reverse X2 = 26.61; P < 0.001) and landing with the lead ankle in dorsiflexion (FS Air X2 = 3.90, FS Air Reverse X2 = 13.64; P < 0.05), were found to be associated with successful landings. These critical features help surfers land in a stable position, while maintaining contact with the surfboard. The results of this study provide coaches with evidence to adjust the technique of their athletes to improve their winning potential. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 24 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 25 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 26 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,287,307
of 32,533,927 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#1,202
of 3,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,714
of 478,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#27
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,533,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.