↓ Skip to main content

Learning-Based Cost Functions for 3-D and 4-D Multi-Surface Multi-Object Segmentation of Knee MRI: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Learning-Based Cost Functions for 3-D and 4-D Multi-Surface Multi-Object Segmentation of Knee MRI: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative
Published in
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, December 2017
DOI 10.1109/tmi.2017.2781541
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A fully automated knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation method to study osteoarthritis (OA) was developed using a novel hierarchical set of random forests (RF) classifiers to learn the appearance of cartilage regions and their boundaries. A neighborhood approximation forest is used first to provide contextual feature to the second-level RF classifier that also considers local features and produces location-specific costs for the layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces (LOGISMOS) framework. Double-echo steady state MRIs used in this paper originated from the OA Initiative study. Trained on 34 MRIs with varying degrees of OA, the performance of the learning-based method tested on 108 MRIs showed significant reduction in segmentation errors ( ) compared with the conventional gradient-based and single-stage RF-learned costs. The 3-D LOGISMOS was extended to longitudinal-3-D (4-D) to simultaneously segment multiple follow-up visits of the same patient. As such, data from all time-points of the temporal sequence contribute information to a single optimal solution that utilizes both spatial 3-D and temporal contexts. 4-D LOGISMOS validation on 108 MRIs from baseline, and 12 month follow-up scans of 54 patients showed significant reduction in segmentation errors ( ) compared with 3-D. Finally, the potential of 4-D LOGISMOS was further explored on the same 54 patients using five annual follow-up scans demonstrating a significant improvement of measuring cartilage thickness ( ) compared with the sequential 3-D approach.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 19 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Engineering 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 25 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,745,807
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#2,943
of 3,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,880
of 445,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,746 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.