↓ Skip to main content

Late Development of Ulcerative Keratitis in Radial Keratotomy Scars

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Ophthalmology, August 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Late Development of Ulcerative Keratitis in Radial Keratotomy Scars
Published in
Archives of Ophthalmology, August 1986
DOI 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050200062050
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We describe three patients in whom ulcerative keratitis developed seven months to 2 1/2 years after uncomplicated radial keratotomy. All ulcers occurred along keratotomy scars within the interpalpebral fissure or inferiorly. At least one case developed spontaneously; another patient may have sustained an unrecognized corneal injury. The third patient was using an extended-wear soft contact lens for correction of residual myopia. Bacteria were isolated from two of the ulcers. With therapy, all ulcers healed without reducing visual acuity. We hypothesize that the altered structure of the slowly healing keratotomy incisions coupled with redistribution of the tear film due to changes in corneal topography may result in intermittent epithelial irregularities. Alone or in conjunction with any form of mechanical or hypoxic corneal injury, these changes along keratotomy incisions may predispose to corneal infection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 33%
Other 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#9,514,662
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Ophthalmology
#93
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,756
of 12,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Ophthalmology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them