↓ Skip to main content

Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Neurology, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders
Published in
Seminars in Neurology, April 2007
DOI 10.1055/s-2007-971171
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Botulinum toxin inhibits the vesicular release of acetylcholine in the neuromuscular junction, resulting in a transient, localized paralysis when small doses are injected. The successful use of serotypes A and B in conditions with muscle overactivity such as dystonia and spasticity has been well established. Apart from approved indications, treatment with botulinum toxin injections is attempted in a variety of new areas of neurology, including tremor, tics, and myoclonus. This article provides an update on the uses of botulinum toxin in the field of movement disorders and draws special attention to theoretical and practical treatment issues of primary and secondary dystonic disorders. Long-term experience with this agent suggests that it is an effective and safe treatment not only for approved indications but also for the increasing number of off-label indications. However, controlled studies for many conditions are lacking, and more clinical trials in many different areas are warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,633,569
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Neurology
#237
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,397
of 132,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Neurology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.