↓ Skip to main content

TOXIC SHOCK SYNDROME AND BACTERIAL SUPERANTIGENS: An Update

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Microbiology, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,287)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TOXIC SHOCK SYNDROME AND BACTERIAL SUPERANTIGENS: An Update
Published in
Annual Review of Microbiology, October 2001
DOI 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.77
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is an acute onset illness characterized by fever, rash formation, and hypotension that can lead to multiple organ failure and lethal shock, as well as desquamation in patients that recover. The disease is caused by bacterial superantigens (SAGs) secreted from Staphylococcus aureus and group A streptococci. SAGs bypass normal antigen presentation by binding to class II major histocompatibility complex molecules on antigen-presenting cells and to specific variable regions on the beta-chain of the T-cell antigen receptor. Through this interaction, SAGs activate T cells at orders of magnitude above antigen-specific activation, resulting in massive cytokine release that is believed to be responsible for the most severe features of TSS. This review focuses on clinical and epidemiological aspects of TSS, as well as important developments in the genetics, biochemistry, immunology, and structural biology of SAGs. From the evolutionary relationships between these important toxins, we propose that there are five distinct groups of SAGs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 263 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 16%
Student > Master 34 13%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 66 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 35 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 10%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 72 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2021.
All research outputs
#953,348
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Microbiology
#38
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#644
of 65,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Microbiology
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.