↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Outcome Desirability on Optimism

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Bulletin, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Influence of Outcome Desirability on Optimism
Published in
Psychological Bulletin, January 2007
DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.95
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

People are often presumed to be vulnerable to a desirability bias, namely, a tendency to be overoptimistic about a future outcome as a result of their preferences or desires for that outcome. In this article, this form of wishful thinking is distinguished from the more general concepts of motivated reasoning and overoptimism, and the evidence for this bias is reviewed. The authors argue that despite the prevalence of the idea that desires bias optimism, the empirical evidence regarding this possibility is limited. The potential for desires to depress rather than enhance optimism is discussed, and the authors advocate for greater research attention to mediators of both types of effects. Nine possible mediational accounts are described, and critical issues for future research on the desirability bias are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Argentina 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 281 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 27%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Researcher 23 8%
Other 73 24%
Unknown 42 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 123 41%
Business, Management and Accounting 53 17%
Social Sciences 21 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 5%
Unspecified 7 2%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 51 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2026.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Bulletin
#1,368
of 2,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,195
of 168,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Bulletin
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.