↓ Skip to main content

In Vitro Evaluation of Shoulder External Rotation After a Bankart Reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, July 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
In Vitro Evaluation of Shoulder External Rotation After a Bankart Reconstruction
Published in
The American Journal of Sports Medicine, July 1997
DOI 10.1177/036354659702500406
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Bankart procedure is a commonly performed anterior shoulder reconstruction that may shorten the anterior capsule. In this study, biomechanical testing was performed to evaluate the effect of the classic Bankart reconstruction on external rotation of the shoulder. The procedure was performed on six fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens that were free of intraarticular pathologic changes. With the arm in 0 degrees of abduction, resisting torques about the vertical axis were measured while the humerus was externally rotated. The intact specimens demonstrated a nonlinear load displacement behavior in which little resisting torque was measured until a moderate amount of external rotation was applied. Shortening the capsule by 2 mm resulted in a 40% decrease in the low-tension zone of external rotation, and shortening the capsule an additional 5 mm resulted in a 67% decrease in the low-tension zone. This study demonstrates that the normal shoulder capsule is quite sensitive to anterior capsular shortening and suggests that care must be exercised when performing a Bankart reconstruction to avoid overtightening this structure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Lecturer 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Sports and Recreations 2 11%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,640,547
of 27,712,151 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#5,685
of 6,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,856
of 32,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,712,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.