↓ Skip to main content

Nystatin Perforated Patch Recording and Its Applications to Analyses of Intracellular Mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese journal of physiology, January 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 217)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nystatin Perforated Patch Recording and Its Applications to Analyses of Intracellular Mechanisms
Published in
The Japanese journal of physiology, January 1994
DOI 10.2170/jjphysiol.44.433
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have reviewed the basic aspects of history, physicochemical properties, advantages, disadvantages, and applications of nystatin- and amphotericin B-perforated patch recording. Recently, we have developed a novel perforated patch technique using gramicidin [49, 132, 133]. Since gramicidin pores are permeable to Na+ and K+ but not to Cl-, it is possible to maintain the physiological concentration of intracellular Cl- and thereby to measure it in real-time from small neurons. Further improvement of the perforated patch techniques would be possible by limiting redistribution of specific intracellular ions. In light of their broad applicability, the perforated patch techniques will prove indispensable for electrophysiologists working on the functions and modulations of receptors, ion channels and transport phenomena. Research with the perforated patch should continue to provide important information relevant to the physiological and pathological conditions of cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 125 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor 12 9%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 27%
Neuroscience 24 18%
Engineering 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 36 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2025.
All research outputs
#3,778,303
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese journal of physiology
#13
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,445
of 103,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese journal of physiology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them