Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides mechanical circulatory support for patients with advanced cardiogenic shock, facilitating myocardial recovery and limiting multi-organ failure. In patients with severely limited left ventricular ejection, peripheral VA-ECMO can further increase left ventricular and left atrial pressures (LAP). Failure to decompress the left heart under these circumstances can result in pulmonary edema and upper body hypoxemia, that is, myocardial and cerebral ischemia. Atrial septostomy can decrease LAP in these situations. However, the effects of atrial septostomy on upper body oxygenation remain unknown. After IRB approval, we identified 9 out of 242 adult VA-ECMO patients between January 2011 and June 2016 who also underwent atrial septostomy for refractory pulmonary edema/upper body hypoxemia. We analyzed LAP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), right atrial pressures (RAPs), Pa O2 /Fi O2 ratios (blood samples from right radial artery), intrathoracic volume status, and resolution of pulmonary edema before and up to 48 h after septostomy. There were no procedure-related complications. Thirty-day survival was 44%. LAP/PCWP decreased by approximately 40% immediately following septostomy and remained so for at least 24 h. Pa O2 /Fi O2 ratios significantly increased from 0.49 (0.38-2.12) before to 5.35 (3.01-7.69) immediately after septostomy and continued so for 24 h, 6.6 (4.49-10.93). Radiographic measurements also indicated a significant improvement in thoracic intravascular volume status after atrial septostomy. Atrial septostomy reduces LAP and improves upper body oxygenation and intrathoracic vascular volume status in patients developing severe refractory pulmonary edema while undergoing peripheral VA-ECMO. Atrial septostomy therefore appears safe and suitable to reduce the risk of upper body ischemia under these circumstances.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
3%
Computer Science
1
3%
Other
0
0%
Unknown
9
30%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#16,633,961
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from Artificial Organs
#1,427
of 1,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,151
of 451,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Artificial Organs
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
