↓ Skip to main content

THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam1

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
449 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
783 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam1
Published in
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 1998
DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.113
Authors

Thomas H. Fritts, Gordon H. Rodda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 783 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 38 5%
United States 11 1%
Spain 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Other 16 2%
Unknown 694 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 139 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 16%
Student > Master 126 16%
Student > Bachelor 103 13%
Student > Postgraduate 50 6%
Other 156 20%
Unknown 81 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 476 61%
Environmental Science 164 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 1%
Social Sciences 8 1%
Other 28 4%
Unknown 86 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,700,921
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#186
of 863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#835
of 41,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.