↓ Skip to main content

TIR Domain Proteins Are an Ancient Family of NAD+-Consuming Enzymes

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
patent
8 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TIR Domain Proteins Are an Ancient Family of NAD+-Consuming Enzymes
Published in
Current Biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.024
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain is the signature signaling domain of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and their adaptors, serving as a scaffold for the assembly of protein complexes for innate immune signaling [1, 2]. TIR domain proteins are also expressed in plants, where they mediate disease resistance [3, 4], and in bacteria, where they have been associated with virulence [5-9]. In pursuing our work on axon degeneration [10], we made the surprising discovery that the TIR domain of SARM1 (sterile alpha and TIR motif containing 1), a TLR adaptor protein, has enzymatic activity [11]. Upon axon injury, the SARM1 TIR domain cleaves nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), destroying this essential metabolic co-factor to trigger axon destruction [11, 12]. Whereas current studies of TIR domains focus on their scaffolding function, our findings with SARM1 inspired us to ask whether this enzymatic activity is the primordial function of the TIR domain. Here we show that ancestral prokaryotic TIR domains constitute a new family of NADase enzymes. Using purified proteins from a cell-free translation system, we find that TIR domain proteins from both bacteria and archaea cleave NAD+ into nicotinamide and ADP-ribose (ADPR), with catalytic cleavage executed by a conserved glutamic acid. A subset of bacterial and archaeal TIR domains generates a non-canonical variant cyclic ADPR (cADPR) molecule, and the full-length TIR domain protein from pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus induces NAD+ loss in mammalian cells. These findings suggest that the primordial function of the TIR domain is the enzymatic cleavage of NAD+ and establish TIR domain proteins as a new class of metabolic regulatory enzymes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 18%
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 56 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 18%
Neuroscience 15 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 63 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,270,807
of 33,248,718 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#3,566
of 17,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,084
of 484,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#56
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,248,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.