↓ Skip to main content

The pharmacology of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels: emerging from the darkness.

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pharmaceutical Design, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The pharmacology of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels: emerging from the darkness.
Published in
Current Pharmaceutical Design, January 2006
DOI 10.2174/138161206778522100
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) ion channels play a central role in vision and olfaction, generating the electrical responses to light in photoreceptors and to odorants in olfactory receptors. These channels have been detected in many other tissues where their functions are largely unclear. The use of gene knockouts and other methods have yielded some information, but there is a pressing need for potent and specific pharmacological agents directed at CNG channels. To date there has been very little systematic effort in this direction - most of what can be termed CNG channel pharmacology arose from testing reagents known to target protein kinases or other ion channels, or by accident when researchers were investigating other intracellular pathways that may regulate the activity of CNG channels. Predictably, these studies have not produced selective agents. However, taking advantage of emerging structural information and the increasing knowledge of the biophysical properties of these channels, some promising compounds and strategies have begun to emerge. In this review we discuss progress on two fronts, cyclic nucleotide analogs as both activators and competitive inhibitors, and inhibitors that target the pore or gating machinery of the channel. We also discuss the potential of these compounds for treating certain forms of retinal degeneration.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 22 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Chemistry 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#12,356,702
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#2,044
of 4,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,950
of 236,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#101
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.