↓ Skip to main content

BioMEMS for biosensors and closed-loop drug delivery

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Pharmaceutics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
BioMEMS for biosensors and closed-loop drug delivery
Published in
International Journal of Pharmaceutics, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.01.030
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The efficacy of pharmaceutical treatments can be greatly enhanced by physiological feedback from the patient using biosensors, though this is often invasive or infeasible. By adapting microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology to miniaturize such biosensors, previously inaccessible signals can be obtained, often from inside the patient. This is enabled by the device's extremely small footprint which minimizes both power consumption and implantation trauma, as well as the transport time for chemical analytes, in turn decreasing the sensor's response time. MEMS fabrication also allows mass production which can be easily scaled without sacrificing its high reproducibility and reliability, and allows seamless integration with control circuitry and telemetry which is already produced using the same materials and fabrication steps. By integrating these systems drug delivery devices, many of which are also MEMS-based, closed loop drug delivery can be achieved. This paper surveys the types of signal transduction devices available for biosensing-primarily electrochemical, optical, and mechanical-looking at their implementation via MEMS technology. The impact of MEMS technology on the challenges of biosensor development, particularly safety, power consumption, degradation, fouling, and foreign body response, are also discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 37 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 9%
Chemistry 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Materials Science 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 40 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2019.
All research outputs
#21,015,131
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Pharmaceutics
#7,109
of 8,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346,783
of 452,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Pharmaceutics
#60
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.