↓ Skip to main content

Neural substrates of facial recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, May 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neural substrates of facial recognition
Published in
Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, May 1996
DOI 10.1176/jnp.8.2.139
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Seventeen healthy normal volunteers performed three facial recognition tasks while their cerebral blood flow was measured with PET: categorizing faces according to gender, recognizing new faces, and recognizing familiar faces. These tasks activated three different pathways: respectively, the left inferior temporal lobe and left frontal cortex; a predominantly right frontal-right parietal-left cerebellar network; and left lingual and left and right fusiform gyri. These results suggest that humans use different brain regions in performing these three routine daily activities. The results are consistent with previous observations concerning organization of extrastriate visual cortex in human and nonhuman primate lesion studies, including studies of the unusual syndrome of prosopagnosia (loss of the ability to recognize familiar faces with intact ability to recognize a face as a face).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Neuroscience 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,345,312
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
#734
of 1,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,254
of 39,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.