You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Iterative near-term ecological forecasting: Needs, opportunities, and challenges
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1710231115 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael C. Dietze, Andrew Fox, Lindsay M. Beck-Johnson, Julio L. Betancourt, Mevin B. Hooten, Catherine S. Jarnevich, Timothy H. Keitt, Melissa A. Kenney, Christine M. Laney, Laurel G. Larsen, Henry W. Loescher, Claire K. Lunch, Bryan C. Pijanowski, James T. Randerson, Emily K. Read, Andrew T. Tredennick, Rodrigo Vargas, Kathleen C. Weathers, Ethan P. White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 50 | 39% |
Spain | 6 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
Australia | 5 | 4% |
Canada | 4 | 3% |
Portugal | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 44 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 71 | 55% |
Scientists | 56 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 712 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 712 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 157 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 145 | 20% |
Student > Master | 70 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 6% |
Other | 112 | 16% |
Unknown | 144 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 200 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 173 | 24% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 38 | 5% |
Engineering | 22 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 2% |
Other | 65 | 9% |
Unknown | 198 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#310,184
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,612
of 103,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,095
of 451,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#117
of 1,005 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,005 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.