↓ Skip to main content

Review: Disruption of the Postsynaptic Density in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Dementias

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Review: Disruption of the Postsynaptic Density in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Dementias
Published in
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®, September 2010
DOI 10.1177/1533317510382893
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The most common causes of neurodegenerative dementia include Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We believe that, in all 3, aggregates of pathogenic proteins are pathological substrates which are associated with a loss of synaptic function/plasticity. The synaptic plasticity relies on the normal integration of glutamate receptors at the postsynaptic density (PSD). The PSD organizes synaptic proteins to mediate the functional and structural plasticity of the excitatory synapse and to maintain synaptic homeostasis. Here, we will discuss the relevant disruption of the protein network at the PSD in these dementias and the accumulation of the pathological changes at the PSD years before clinical symptoms. We suggest that the functional and structural plasticity changes of the PSD may contribute to the loss of molecular homeostasis within the synapse (and contribute to early symptoms) in these dementias.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 26%
Neuroscience 18 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,591,124
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®
#442
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,771
of 152,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.