↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Metallosupramolecular Architectures Formed with Ferrocene-Linked Bis-Bidentate Ligands: Synthesis, Structures, and Electrochemical Studies
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, January 2018
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02503
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The self-assembly of ligands of different geometries with metal ions gives rise to metallosupramolecular architectures of differing structural types. The rotational flexibility of ferrocene allows for conformational diversity, and, as such, self-assembly processes with 1,1'-disubstituted ferrocene ligands could lead to a variety of interesting architectures. Herein, we report a small family of three bis-bidentate 1,1'-disubstituted ferrocene ligands, functionalized with either 2,2'-bipyridine or 2-pyridyl-1,2,3-triazole chelating units. The self-assembly of these ligands with the (usually) four-coordinate, diamagnetic metal ions Cu(I), Ag(I), and Pd(II) was examined using a range of techniques including 1H and DOSY NMR spectroscopies, high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, X-ray crystallography, and density functional theory calculations. Additionally, the electrochemical properties of these redox-active metallosupramolecular assemblies were examined using cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry. The copper(I) complexes of the 1,1'-disubstituted ferrocene ligands were found to be coordination polymers, while the silver(I) and palladium(II) complexes formed discrete [1 + 1] or [2 + 2] metallomacrocyclic architectures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 21 55%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 15 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,455,690
of 28,033,187 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#13,115
of 25,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,064
of 456,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#122
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,033,187 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,869 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.