↓ Skip to main content

Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
1111 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, February 2005
DOI 10.1038/nrn1606
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We believe that names have a powerful influence on the experiments we do and the way in which we think. For this reason, and in the light of new evidence about the function and evolution of the vertebrate brain, an international consortium of neuroscientists has reconsidered the traditional, 100-year-old terminology that is used to describe the avian cerebrum. Our current understanding of the avian brain - in particular the neocortex-like cognitive functions of the avian pallium - requires a new terminology that better reflects these functions and the homologies between avian and mammalian brains.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 26 2%
Germany 16 1%
Brazil 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Chile 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
China 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 20 2%
Unknown 1021 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 244 22%
Researcher 222 20%
Student > Master 127 11%
Student > Bachelor 124 11%
Professor 67 6%
Other 189 17%
Unknown 138 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 467 42%
Neuroscience 191 17%
Psychology 88 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 3%
Other 120 11%
Unknown 180 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2026.
All research outputs
#566,664
of 34,188,479 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#262
of 3,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#931
of 219,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,188,479 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.