↓ Skip to main content

Alliance Rupture and Resolution in Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Personality Disorders, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Alliance Rupture and Resolution in Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder.
Published in
Journal of Personality Disorders, January 2018
DOI 10.1521/pedi.2018.32.supp.115
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate alliance rupture and resolution processes in the early sessions of a sample of clients who underwent 1 year of standard dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for borderline personality disorder (BPD). Participants were three recovered and three unrecovered clients drawn from the DBT arm of a randomized controlled trial that compared the clinical and cost-effectiveness of DBT and general psychiatric management. Alliance rupture and resolution processes were coded using the observer-based Rupture Resolution Rating Scale. Unrecovered clients evidenced a higher frequency of withdrawal ruptures than recovered clients. Withdrawal ruptures tended to persist for unrecovered clients despite the degree of resolution in the prior session, unlike for recovered clients, for whom the probability of withdrawal ruptures decreased as the degree of resolution increased. This study suggests that alliance rupture and resolution processes in early treatment differ between recovered and unrecovered clients in DBT for BPD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Researcher 9 8%
Librarian 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 43 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 45 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#24,121,891
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Personality Disorders
#550
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,931
of 496,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Personality Disorders
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.