↓ Skip to main content

Screening and Management of Adult Hearing Loss in Primary Care: Scientific Review

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
24 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Screening and Management of Adult Hearing Loss in Primary Care: Scientific Review
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2003
DOI 10.1001/jama.289.15.1976
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 346 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Researcher 37 10%
Other 20 6%
Other 71 20%
Unknown 89 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 9%
Psychology 23 6%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 108 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2025.
All research outputs
#702,472
of 34,383,983 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#6,864
of 42,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#511
of 73,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#16
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,383,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.