↓ Skip to main content

Low-Dose Erythropoietin in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (EPO-AMI-II) ― A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ―

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low-Dose Erythropoietin in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (EPO-AMI-II) ― A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ―
Published in
Circulation Journal, February 2018
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-17-0889
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsuo Minamino, Shuichiro Higo, Ryo Araki, Shungo Hikoso, Daisaku Nakatani, Hiroshi Suzuki, Takahisa Yamada, Masaaki Okutsu, Kouji Yamamoto, Yasushi Fujio, Yoshio Ishida, Takuya Ozawa, Kiminori Kato, Ken Toba, Yoshifusa Aizawa, Issei Komuro, EPO-AMI-II Investigators

Abstract

Erythropoietin (EPO) has antiapoptotic and tissue-protective effects, but previous clinical studies using high-dose EPO have not shown cardioprotective effects, probably because of platelet activation and a lack of knowledge regarding the optimal dose. In contrast, a small pilot study using low-dose EPO has shown improvement in left ventricular function without adverse cardiovascular events.Methods and Results:We performed a multicenter (25 hospitals), prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study to clarify the efficacy and safety of low-dose EPO in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) under the Evaluation System of Investigational Medical Care of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan. In total, 198 STEMI patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) were randomly assigned to receive intravenous administration of EPO (6,000 or 12,000 IU) or placebo within 6 h of successful percutaneous coronary intervention. At 6 months, there was no significant dose-response relationship in LVEF improvement among the 3 groups tested (EPO 12,000 IU: 5.4±9.3%, EPO 6,000 IU: 7.3±7.7%, Placebo: 8.1±8.3%, P=0.862). Low-dose EPO also did not improve cardiac function, as evaluated by 99 mTc-MIBI SPECT or NT-proBNP at 6 months and did not increase adverse events. Administration of low-dose EPO did not improve LVEF at 6 months in STEMI patients (UMIN000005721).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 19 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 20 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,999
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#388,854
of 448,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#25
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.