↓ Skip to main content

Anaplastic plasmacytoma: a rare tumor presenting as a pathological fracture in a younger adult

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anaplastic plasmacytoma: a rare tumor presenting as a pathological fracture in a younger adult
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00256-018-2884-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert W. Morris, Varsha Kumar, Ali G. Saad

Abstract

Solitary plasmacytoma is the rarest type of plasma cell neoplasm, and the anaplastic form is even more uncommon. Plasmacytoma most commonly originates in bone and predominantly affects older patients. We describe the case of a 35-year-old woman with solitary osseous anaplastic plasmacytoma that presented initially with a pathological fracture following minor trauma. The patient was immunocompetent and had no predisposing conditions for a plasma cell tumor. Left lower extremity radiographs revealed an oblique fracture of the distal femur, and CT imaging indicated a primary osseous lesion at the fracture site. MRI confirmed the diagnosis of pathological fracture. Initial surgical pathology of the lesion was concerning because it could have been an osteosarcoma. Further immunostaining demonstrated CD138 positivity and kappa light chain restriction, confirming the diagnosis of plasmacytoma. In addition, the presence of marked anaplastic cellular changes confirmed the anaplastic variant. Further workup showed no evidence of multiple myeloma. This case is unusual given the age and gender of the patient. Awareness of the anaplastic variant of plasmacytoma is important to avoid erroneous diagnoses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,927,741
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#1,130
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,632
of 440,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#48
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.