↓ Skip to main content

Mitogenic Signaling Mediated by Oxidants in Ras-Transformed Fibroblasts

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
22 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mitogenic Signaling Mediated by Oxidants in Ras-Transformed Fibroblasts
Published in
Science, March 1997
DOI 10.1126/science.275.5306.1649
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

NIH 3T3 fibroblasts stably transformed with a constitutively active isoform of p21(Ras), H-RasV12 (v-H-Ras or EJ-Ras), produced large amounts of the reactive oxygen species superoxide (.O2-). .O2- production was suppressed by the expression of dominant negative isoforms of Ras or Rac1, as well as by treatment with a farnesyltransferase inhibitor or with diphenylene iodonium, a flavoprotein inhibitor. The mitogenic activity of cells expressing H-RasV12 was inhibited by treatment with the chemical antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity was decreased and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) was not activated in H-RasV12-transformed cells. Thus, H-RasV12-induced transformation can lead to the production of .O2- through one or more pathways involving a flavoprotein and Rac1. The implication of a reactive oxygen species, probably .O2-, as a mediator of Ras-induced cell cycle progression independent of MAPK and JNK suggests a possible mechanism for the effects of antioxidants against Ras-induced cellular transformation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 335 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 20%
Researcher 61 18%
Professor 34 10%
Student > Master 34 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 64 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 11%
Chemistry 16 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 75 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,439,043
of 28,695,121 outputs
Outputs from Science
#31,450
of 87,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,193
of 33,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#30
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,695,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.