↓ Skip to main content

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: changes in pathogenesis, epidemiology and definition

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Neonatology, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: changes in pathogenesis, epidemiology and definition
Published in
Seminars in Neonatology, February 2003
DOI 10.1016/s1084-2756(02)00192-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) continues to be one of the most common long-term complications associated with preterm birth. Its incidence is increasing as the survival of extreme premature infants improves, but its clinical presentation is milder than the original description of Northway and collaborators. In contrast to the classic BPD that was strongly related to mechanical injury and oxygen toxicity, current forms of the condition are more related to immaturity, perinatal infection and inflammation, persistent ductus arteriosus and disrupted alveolar and capillary development. Many different definitions of BPD have been proposed, most of which are based on the duration of supplemental oxygen requirement. The different definitions can produce strikingly different incidence figures, which may account for the wide variations in the condition reported in the literature. Some of the limitations of the criteria most commonly used to diagnose BPD are discussed in this article.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 180 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 45 24%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 49 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2024.
All research outputs
#6,087,168
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Neonatology
#9
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,447
of 153,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Neonatology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one scored the same or higher as 38 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.