↓ Skip to main content

The Journal of Rheumatology

Which measure of inflammation to use? A comparison of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein measurements from randomized clinical trials of golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Rheumatology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
11 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Which measure of inflammation to use? A comparison of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein measurements from randomized clinical trials of golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis.
Published in
Journal of Rheumatology, June 2009
DOI 10.3899/jrheum.081188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia S Crowson, Mahboob U Rahman, Eric L Matteson

Abstract

To assess clinical utility of measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP) versus Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in evaluating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 3%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Other 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,340,533
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rheumatology
#1,140
of 3,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,366
of 115,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rheumatology
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.