↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating work ability and quality of life for clinical nurses in Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in Nursing Outlook, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluating work ability and quality of life for clinical nurses in Taiwan
Published in
Nursing Outlook, November 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.07.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study investigated the work ability and its relationship with quality of life for the clinical nurses in Taiwan. The survey was of 1534 nursing professionals from 8 different hospitals. Work ability of nursing professionals varied by age, work experience, working departments and hospital types. Work ability of nurses increased with age until after the age of 45. Personal health condition and physical workload were the main factors contributing to the decline of the perceived work ability for senior nurses. For young nurses, the mental demands of work were a critical influence on their work ability. Moreover, work ability of nurses varied among hospital type and department. The work ability of nurses was strongly associated with the quality and safety of the work environment and leisure time management. For improving and maintaining the work ability of nurses, countermeasures such as enhancing the ability to cope with the job's mental demands for young nurses, and improving the job design to reduce physical workload for senior nurses are recommended.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 39 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#12,028,293
of 34,675,792 outputs
Outputs from Nursing Outlook
#465
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,120
of 126,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing Outlook
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,675,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them