↓ Skip to main content

Differential Increases in Average Isokinetic Power by Specific Muscle Groups of Older Women Due to Variations in Training and Testing

Overview of attention for article published in Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differential Increases in Average Isokinetic Power by Specific Muscle Groups of Older Women Due to Variations in Training and Testing
Published in
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, October 2002
DOI 10.1093/gerona/57.10.m683
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

As a person ages, leg speed and power decrease. These changes are associated with increased falls and reduced gait speed. It has been shown that upper leg training in younger persons results in increased strength and power at the specific speed at which resistance training is applied, although there are only limited data concerning speed-specific training effects on lower leg activity. However, because both upper and lower leg speed and power influence gait and balance, it is important to determine the training speeds that selectively improve these variables in older persons.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 40 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 18 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 52 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#31,186,061
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#4,575
of 4,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,754
of 71,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.